N100 vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 92.6 k points while the 3250U gets 69.5 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.3 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 92.6 k points while the 3250U gets 69.5 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.3 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-N
Dali
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.2k points
30.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.6k points
69.45k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
8.3k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
12.17k
15.24k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.25k
3.35k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.74k
3.39k (x0.59)
TOTAL
40.2k
30.28k (x0.75)
Multithread
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
38k
19.36k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
34.92k
36.56k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.89k
9.23k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
4.3k (x1.13)
TOTAL
92.6k
69.45k (x0.75)
Performance/W
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
6333 points/W
1291 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5820 points/W
2437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2649 points/W
616 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
15433 points/W
4630 points/W
Performance/GHz
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
4718 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3580 points/GHz
4353 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1838 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1687 points/GHz
969 points/GHz
TOTAL
11824 points/GHz
8652 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4