N100 vs Athlon Gold 7220U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7220U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 92.6 k points while the 7220U gets 87 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.1 times faster than the 7220U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 92.6 k points while the 7220U gets 87 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.1 times faster than the 7220U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
8a0f00
Core
Alder Lake-N
Mendocino
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
FT6
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
40.2k points
39.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.6k points
87.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7220U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
14.09k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
12.17k
10.91k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.25k
7.52k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.74k
6.7k (x1.17)
TOTAL
40.2k
39.21k (x0.98)
Multithread
7220U
Test#1 (Integers)
38k
36.97k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
34.92k
24.37k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.89k
20.23k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
5.45k (x1.44)
TOTAL
92.6k
87.02k (x0.94)
Performance/W
7220U
Test#1 (Integers)
6333 points/W
2465 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5820 points/W
1624 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2649 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/W
364 points/W
TOTAL
15433 points/W
5801 points/W
Performance/GHz
7220U
Test#1 (Integers)
4718 points/GHz
3808 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3580 points/GHz
2948 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1838 points/GHz
2032 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1687 points/GHz
1810 points/GHz
TOTAL
11824 points/GHz
10598 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4