Core i3-N305 vs N150
Description
The i3-N305 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the is based on Gracemont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-N305 gets a score of 226.7 k points while the gets 98.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-N305 is 2.3 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-N305 gets a score of 226.7 k points while the gets 98.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-N305 is 2.3 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
b06e0
Core
Alder Lake-N
Twin Lake
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2025
Mean monothread perf.
45.05k points
34.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
226.69k points
98.93k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-N305
Test#1 (Integers)
18.17k
13.85k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
13.93k
10.38k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.23k
5k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
5.51k (x0.96)
TOTAL
45.05k
34.73k (x0.77)
Multithread
i3-N305
Test#1 (Integers)
111.28k
41.86k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
77.37k
35.28k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.13k
16.55k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.9k
5.24k (x1.8)
TOTAL
226.69k
98.93k (x0.44)
Performance/W
i3-N305
Test#1 (Integers)
7419 points/W
6977 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5158 points/W
5879 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2342 points/W
2758 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
194 points/W
873 points/W
TOTAL
15112 points/W
16488 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-N305
Test#1 (Integers)
4783 points/GHz
3847 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3667 points/GHz
2883 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1903 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1504 points/GHz
1530 points/GHz
TOTAL
11856 points/GHz
9649 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4