Celeron N5100 vs N95
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the gets 102.4 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.1 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the gets 102.4 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.1 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
b06e0
Core
Jasper Lake
Gracemont
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
39.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
105.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
12.31k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
12.13k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
7.03k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
7.32k (x2.08)
TOTAL
26.98k
38.79k (x1.44)
Multithread
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
38.72k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
37.18k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
22.53k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
3.97k (x0.98)
TOTAL
89.82k
102.41k (x1.14)
Performance/W
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
2582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
2479 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
1502 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
6827 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
3621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
2068 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
2152 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
11410 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4