Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium E5200 (M0)
Description
Both models SU7300 and E5200 (M0) are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.9 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.9 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
10676
Core
Peryn-3M
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 956
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2009
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
6.92k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.27k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
SU7300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1.48k
2.88k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
3.27k
6.31k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
2.53k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.93k
1.35k (x1.45)
TOTAL
6.92k
13.08k (x1.89)
Multithread
SU7300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2.54k
5.45k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
5.49k
11.5k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
4.02k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.13k
1.05k (x0.93)
TOTAL
11.27k
22.02k (x1.95)
Performance/W
SU7300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
254 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
549 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
210 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
1127 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
SU7300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1139 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
714 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
5325 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4