| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Xeon E3-1230 v5


Description
The SU7300 is based on Core architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 3.4 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
506e3
Core
Peryn-3M
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 956
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
10 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2009
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
6.92k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.27k points
37.88k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
SU7300
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
1.48k
2.59k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
3.27k
3.94k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
1k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.93k
2k (x2.15)
TOTAL
6.92k
9.52k (x1.38)

Multithread

SU7300

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
2.54k
10.4k (x4.09)
Test#2 (FP)
5.49k
16.64k (x3.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
4.51k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.13k
6.33k (x5.62)
TOTAL
11.27k
37.88k (x3.36)

Performance/W
SU7300
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
254 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
549 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
210 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
1127 points/W
474 points/W

Performance/GHz
SU7300
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
1139 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
714 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
5325 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4