Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs T6500
Description
Both models SU7300 and T6500 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the T6500 gets 9.2 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 1.2 times faster than the T6500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the T6500 gets 9.2 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 1.2 times faster than the T6500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
1067a
Core
Peryn-3M
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 956
FC-PGA 478
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2009
April 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.92k points
10.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.27k points
9.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
SU7300
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.48k
2.41k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
3.27k
5.31k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
2.04k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.93k
1.14k (x1.23)
TOTAL
6.92k
10.9k (x1.58)
Multithread
SU7300
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.54k
1.81k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
5.49k
4.55k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
1.58k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.13k
1.23k (x1.09)
TOTAL
11.27k
9.17k (x0.81)
Performance/W
SU7300
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
254 points/W
52 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
549 points/W
130 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
210 points/W
45 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
1127 points/W
262 points/W
Performance/GHz
SU7300
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
1139 points/GHz
1148 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/GHz
2530 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
972 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
714 points/GHz
542 points/GHz
TOTAL
5325 points/GHz
5192 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4