Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Atom N450
Description
The SU7300 is based on Core architecture while the N450 is based on Bonnell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the N450 gets 4.6 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 2.5 times faster than the N450 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the N450 gets 4.6 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 2.5 times faster than the N450 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
106ca
Core
Peryn-3M
Pineview
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
1.667 GHz
Socket
BGA 956
BGA 559
Cores/Threads
2/2
1 /2
TDP
10 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
512 kB
Date
January 2009
December 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.92k points
3.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.27k points
4.58k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
SU7300
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
1.48k
1.08k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
3.27k
0.84k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
0.94k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.93k
0.56k (x0.61)
TOTAL
6.92k
3.42k (x0.49)
Multithread
SU7300
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
2.54k
1.32k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
5.49k
1.33k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
1.29k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.13k
0.63k (x0.56)
TOTAL
11.27k
4.58k (x0.41)
Performance/W
SU7300
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
254 points/W
220 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
549 points/W
222 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
210 points/W
216 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
1127 points/W
763 points/W
Performance/GHz
SU7300
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
1139 points/GHz
647 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/GHz
504 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
714 points/GHz
337 points/GHz
TOTAL
5325 points/GHz
2051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4