Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs E Series E-350
Description
The SU7300 is based on Core architecture while the E-350 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 1.1 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 1.1 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
500f10
Core
Peryn-3M
Zacate
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 956
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
10 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2x512 kB
Date
January 2009
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
6.92k points
6.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.27k points
10.05k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
SU7300
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.48k
1.78k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
3.27k
2.33k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
1.41k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.93k
0.74k (x0.8)
TOTAL
6.92k
6.26k (x0.9)
Multithread
SU7300
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
2.54k
2.84k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
5.49k
3.89k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.42k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.13k
0.9k (x0.8)
TOTAL
11.27k
10.05k (x0.89)
Performance/W
SU7300
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
254 points/W
158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
549 points/W
216 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
210 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
1127 points/W
558 points/W
Performance/GHz
SU7300
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1139 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/GHz
1454 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
879 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
714 points/GHz
465 points/GHz
TOTAL
5325 points/GHz
3914 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4