| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs A4 3310MX


Description
The SU7300 is based on Core architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.5 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
300f10
Core
Peryn-3M
Llano
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 956
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
10 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2009
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
6.92k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.27k points
16.5k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
SU7300
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1.48k
3.98k (x2.69)
Test#2 (FP)
3.27k
4k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
2.05k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.93k
1.37k (x1.47)
TOTAL
6.92k
11.4k (x1.65)

Multithread

SU7300

3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
2.54k
5.74k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
5.49k
6.05k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.85k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.13k
1.86k (x1.65)
TOTAL
11.27k
16.5k (x1.46)

Performance/W
SU7300
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
254 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
549 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
210 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
1127 points/W
367 points/W

Performance/GHz
SU7300
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1139 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
714 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
5325 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4