Core Duo T2300 vs Celeron N2840
Description
The T2300 is based on P6 Enhanced Pentium M architecture while the N2840 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.8 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.8 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6e8
30678
Core
Yonah
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
1.66 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.66 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
Socket 479
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
31 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
January 2006
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
5.58k points
10.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.38k points
16.79k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T2300
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1.46k
4.8k (x3.28)
Test#2 (FP)
1.63k
2.47k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.53k
1.86k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
1.22k (x1.27)
TOTAL
5.58k
10.36k (x1.85)
Multithread
T2300
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
2.42k
8.24k (x3.41)
Test#2 (FP)
2.95k
4.19k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
3.05k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
1.32k (x1.3)
TOTAL
9.38k
16.79k (x1.79)
Performance/W
T2300
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
78 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
95 points/W
598 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97 points/W
436 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
303 points/W
2399 points/W
Performance/GHz
T2300
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
882 points/GHz
1861 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
980 points/GHz
958 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
924 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
578 points/GHz
472 points/GHz
TOTAL
3364 points/GHz
4015 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4