Core Duo T2300 vs E Series E-350
Description
The T2300 is based on P6 Enhanced Pentium M architecture while the E-350 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the E-350 is 1.1 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the E-350 is 1.1 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6e8
500f10
Core
Yonah
Zacate
Base frecuency
1.66 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket 479
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
31 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Date
January 2006
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
5.58k points
6.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.38k points
10.05k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T2300
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.46k
1.78k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
1.63k
2.33k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.53k
1.41k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
0.74k (x0.78)
TOTAL
5.58k
6.26k (x1.12)
Multithread
T2300
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
2.42k
2.84k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
2.95k
3.89k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
2.42k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
0.9k (x0.89)
TOTAL
9.38k
10.05k (x1.07)
Performance/W
T2300
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
78 points/W
158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
95 points/W
216 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
303 points/W
558 points/W
Performance/GHz
T2300
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
882 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
980 points/GHz
1454 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
924 points/GHz
879 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
578 points/GHz
465 points/GHz
TOTAL
3364 points/GHz
3914 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4