Core Duo T2300 vs C Series C-60
Description
The T2300 is based on P6 Enhanced Pentium M architecture while the C-60 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the T2300 is 1.1 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the T2300 is 1.1 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6e8
500f20
Core
Yonah
Ontario
Base frecuency
1.66 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.66 GHz
1.33 GHz
Socket
Socket 479
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
31 W
9 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Date
January 2006
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
5.58k points
4.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.38k points
8.53k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T2300
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
1.46k
1.32k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
1.63k
1.94k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.53k
1.07k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
0.45k (x0.47)
TOTAL
5.58k
4.79k (x0.86)
Multithread
T2300
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
2.42k
2.36k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
2.95k
3.52k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
1.92k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
0.73k (x0.72)
TOTAL
9.38k
8.53k (x0.91)
Performance/W
T2300
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
78 points/W
262 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
95 points/W
391 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97 points/W
213 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
303 points/W
948 points/W
Performance/GHz
T2300
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
882 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
980 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
924 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
578 points/GHz
342 points/GHz
TOTAL
3364 points/GHz
3599 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4