Pentium Dual-Core E2160 vs Xeon E5645
Description
The E2160 is based on Core architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2160 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 6 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2160 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 6 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f2
206c2
Core
Allendale
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /6
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2007
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
7k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.87k points
76.96k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E2160
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
1.81k
1.78k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
1.81k
3.91k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.79k
2.52k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.16k
2.42k (x2.09)
TOTAL
6.58k
10.64k (x1.62)
Multithread
E2160
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
3.62k
9.67k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
3.61k
22.92k (x6.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
14.31k (x3.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
3.81k (x3.2)
TOTAL
12.01k
50.7k (x4.22)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E2160
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
6.47k (x3.11)
Test#2 (FP)
1.88k
4.4k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
2.43k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.16k
2.33k (x2.01)
TOTAL
7k
15.64k (x2.23)
Multithread
E2160
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
34.43k (x8.28)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
24.23k (x6.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
14.48k (x3.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
3.81k (x3.21)
TOTAL
12.87k
76.96k (x5.98)
Performance/W
E2160
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
64 points/W
430 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
58 points/W
303 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58 points/W
181 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
198 points/W
962 points/W
Performance/GHz
E2160
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1043 points/GHz
1573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
867 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/GHz
833 points/GHz
TOTAL
3891 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4