Pentium Dual-Core E2160 vs Core 2 Duo T7250
Description
Both models E2160 and T7250 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2160 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.
Summarizing, the T7250 is 1.1 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2160 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.
Summarizing, the T7250 is 1.1 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f2
6fd
Core
Allendale
Merom
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2007
September 2007
Mean monothread perf.
7k points
7.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.87k points
13.82k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E2160
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1.81k
1.96k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
1.81k
2k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.79k
1.96k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.16k
1.22k (x1.05)
TOTAL
6.58k
7.14k (x1.09)
Multithread
E2160
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
3.62k
3.87k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
3.61k
3.95k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
3.8k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
1.34k (x1.13)
TOTAL
12.01k
12.96k (x1.08)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E2160
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
2.27k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
1.88k
2.07k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
2.01k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.16k
1.22k (x1.06)
TOTAL
7k
7.57k (x1.08)
Multithread
E2160
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
4.51k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
4.09k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
3.9k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
1.32k (x1.11)
TOTAL
12.87k
13.82k (x1.07)
Performance/W
E2160
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
64 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
58 points/W
117 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
198 points/W
395 points/W
Performance/GHz
E2160
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1043 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/GHz
611 points/GHz
TOTAL
3891 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4