Pentium Dual-Core E2160 vs Atom N450
Description
The E2160 is based on Core architecture while the N450 is based on Bonnell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2160 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the N450 gets 4.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E2160 is 2.8 times faster than the N450 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2160 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the N450 gets 4.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E2160 is 2.8 times faster than the N450 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f2
106ca
Core
Allendale
Pineview
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.667 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 559
Cores/Threads
2/2
1 /2
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
512 kB
Date
June 2007
December 2009
Mean monothread perf.
7k points
3.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.87k points
4.58k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E2160
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
1.81k
0.37k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
1.81k
0.77k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.79k
0.79k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.16k
0.63k (x0.54)
TOTAL
6.58k
2.55k (x0.39)
Multithread
E2160
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
3.62k
0.56k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
3.61k
1.25k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
1.09k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
0.64k (x0.54)
TOTAL
12.01k
3.55k (x0.3)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E2160
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
1.08k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
1.88k
0.84k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
0.94k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.16k
0.56k (x0.49)
TOTAL
7k
3.42k (x0.49)
Multithread
E2160
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
1.32k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
1.33k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
1.29k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
0.63k (x0.53)
TOTAL
12.87k
4.58k (x0.36)
Performance/W
E2160
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
64 points/W
220 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
58 points/W
222 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58 points/W
216 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
198 points/W
763 points/W
Performance/GHz
E2160
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
647 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1043 points/GHz
504 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/GHz
337 points/GHz
TOTAL
3891 points/GHz
2051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4