Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
406f1
Core
Kaby Lake
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
- W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2016
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
237.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
12.16k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
11.82k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
3.02k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
2.4k (x0.23)
TOTAL
58.05k
29.39k (x0.51)
Multithread
506E8 3GHz
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
103.77k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
102.28k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
26.13k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
5.65k (x0.98)
TOTAL
210.91k
237.83k (x1.13)
Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)