Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
50657
Core
Kaby Lake
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
- W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
June 2016
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
12.92k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
10.97k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
2.54k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
5.09k (x0.49)
TOTAL
58.05k
31.52k (x0.54)
Multithread
506E8 3GHz
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
103.33k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
87.67k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
20.1k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
4.91k (x0.85)
TOTAL
210.91k
216.02k (x1.02)
Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)