Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
a50f00
Core
Kaby Lake
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
- W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
June 2016
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
21.2k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
25k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
11.44k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
24.22k (x2.33)
TOTAL
58.05k
81.87k (x1.41)
Multithread
506E8 3GHz
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
145.13k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
198.36k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
85.67k (x3.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
5.79k (x1.01)
TOTAL
210.91k
434.96k (x2.06)
Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)