Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.6 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.6 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
800f82
Core
Kaby Lake
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
- W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
June 2016
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
15.75k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
26.29k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
5.91k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
18.48k (x1.78)
TOTAL
58.05k
66.44k (x1.14)
Multithread
506E8 3GHz
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
94.49k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
182.53k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
45.95k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
10.15k (x1.77)
TOTAL
210.91k
333.12k (x1.58)
Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)