| | | | | | |

Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.3 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e8
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
- W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2016
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
168.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
14.48k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
23.84k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
5.43k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
5.46k (x0.53)
TOTAL
58.05k
49.21k (x0.85)

Multithread

506E8 3GHz

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
54.39k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
88.77k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
20.04k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
5.48k (x0.95)
TOTAL
210.91k
168.69k (x0.8)

Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)