Engineering Sample 506E8 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.7 times faster than the 506E8. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.7 times faster than the 506E8. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
860f01
Core
Kaby Lake
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
- W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
June 2016
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.39k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
211.6k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
23.91k
14.87k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
21.03k
21.53k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
8.39k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
8.21k (x1.28)
TOTAL
56.39k
53k (x0.94)
Multithread
506E8
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
95.3k
124.63k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
91.94k
158.62k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.06k
69.79k (x3.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.3k
7.53k (x3.27)
TOTAL
211.6k
360.57k (x1.7)
Performance/W
506E8
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)