| | | | | | |

Engineering Sample 506E8 vs Athlon 3000G


Description
The 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 506E8 is 2.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e8
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
- W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2016
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.39k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
211.6k points
95.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.91k
13.02k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
21.03k
20.56k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
4.81k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
5.43k (x0.85)
TOTAL
56.39k
43.82k (x0.78)

Multithread

506E8

3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
95.3k
27.29k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
91.94k
49.37k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.06k
13.57k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.3k
5.61k (x2.44)
TOTAL
211.6k
95.84k (x0.45)

Performance/W
506E8
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)