| | | | | | |

Engineering Sample 906ED 2.1GHz vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The 906ED 2.1GHz is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 906ED 2.1GHz gets a score of 657.2 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 906ED 2.1GHz is 1.5 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
- W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
86.65k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
657.19k points
433.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
906ED 2.1GHz
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5.2k
4.25k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
21.19k
19.72k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.85k
5.84k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.48k
21.36k (x1.38)
TOTAL
48.71k
51.17k (x1.05)

Multithread

906ED 2.1GHz

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
42.31k
35.04k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
181.42k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.37k
64.86k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
8.21k (x1.11)
TOTAL
316.12k
289.54k (x0.92)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
906ED 2.1GHz
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
18.76k
15.22k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
27.15k
24.12k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.15k
5.87k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.31k
21k (x1.37)
TOTAL
68.37k
66.21k (x0.97)

Multithread

906ED 2.1GHz

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
156.95k
126.81k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
250.7k
229.86k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.02k
61.74k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
9.77k (x1.31)
TOTAL
485.11k
428.19k (x0.88)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
906ED 2.1GHz
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
18.88k
14.44k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
28.5k
24.92k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.91k
5.8k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.86k
19.07k (x1.28)
TOTAL
69.14k
64.24k (x0.93)

Multithread

906ED 2.1GHz

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
157.47k
122.01k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
265.75k
220.34k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.86k
59.89k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
9.9k (x1.34)
TOTAL
499.47k
412.13k (x0.83)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
906ED 2.1GHz
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.92k
15.61k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
30k
26.08k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
5.84k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
18.34k (x1.17)
TOTAL
86.65k
65.87k (x0.76)

Multithread

906ED 2.1GHz

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
302.78k
123.33k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
278.98k
240.46k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.89k
61.23k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
8.17k (x1.08)
TOTAL
657.19k
433.19k (x0.66)

Performance/W
906ED 2.1GHz
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)