Engineering Sample 906EC vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The 906EC is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 906EC gets a score of 494.2 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 906EC is 2.5 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 906EC gets a score of 494.2 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 906EC is 2.5 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
- W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
494.24k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
906EC
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
28.3k
14.58k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
24.99k
23.98k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.55k
5.35k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.71k
6.34k (x0.54)
TOTAL
70.55k
50.25k (x0.71)
Multithread
906EC
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
229.27k
57.37k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
209.21k
107.03k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.53k
28.9k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
7.05k (x0.97)
TOTAL
494.24k
200.34k (x0.41)
Performance/W
906EC
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)