Engineering Sample 90671 vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The 90671 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 90671 gets a score of 878.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 90671 is 4.4 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 90671 gets a score of 878.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 90671 is 4.4 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90671
810f81
Core
Picasso
Base frecuency
0 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
-/24
4/8
TDP
- W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
- kB
4096 kB
Date
-
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
78.13k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
878.58k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
90671
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
35.2k
14.58k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
25.12k
23.98k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.42k
5.35k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.39k
6.34k (x0.76)
TOTAL
78.13k
50.25k (x0.64)
Multithread
90671
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
391.05k
57.37k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
331.85k
107.03k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
139.66k
28.9k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.02k
7.05k (x0.44)
TOTAL
878.58k
200.34k (x0.23)
Performance/W
90671
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)