Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i3-10100T
Description
The 5950X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5950X gets a score of 1081 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 4.7 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5950X gets a score of 1081 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 4.7 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
a0653
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
16/32
4/8
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
87.3k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
1080.96k points
227.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5950X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.91k
24.31k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
26.24k
22.15k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.87k
5.14k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
8.46k (x0.32)
TOTAL
87.3k
60.06k (x0.69)
Multithread
5950X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
359.17k
101.48k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
479.04k
98.04k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
214.59k
24.28k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.16k
3.86k (x0.14)
TOTAL
1080.96k
227.67k (x0.21)
Performance/W
5950X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3421 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4562 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2044 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
268 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
10295 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
5950X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5363 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
17817 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4