Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i7-10750H
Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
a0652
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.82k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
840.11k points
349.21k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.34k
29.06k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
26.8k
26.49k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.12k
6.23k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.55k
13.89k (x0.52)
TOTAL
89.82k
75.67k (x0.84)
Multithread
5900X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
263.12k
154.61k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
353.9k
151.34k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159.07k
36.33k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.01k
6.93k (x0.11)
TOTAL
840.11k
349.21k (x0.42)
Performance/W
5900X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3371 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1515 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
610 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
8001 points/W
7760 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5071 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5584 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2526 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5530 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
18712 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4