Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i5-9600KF
Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.3 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.3 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
906ec
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/6
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
9216 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
89.82k points
77.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
840.11k points
371.08k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
24.34k
30.52k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
26.8k
26.54k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.12k
6.41k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.55k
13.87k (x0.52)
TOTAL
89.82k
77.34k (x0.86)
Multithread
5900X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
263.12k
174.66k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
353.9k
154.06k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159.07k
34.11k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.01k
8.24k (x0.13)
TOTAL
840.11k
371.08k (x0.44)
Performance/W
5900X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/W
1839 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3371 points/W
1622 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1515 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
610 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
8001 points/W
3906 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5071 points/GHz
6635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5584 points/GHz
5769 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2526 points/GHz
1394 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5530 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
TOTAL
18712 points/GHz
16813 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4