Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i3-12100T
Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.5 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.5 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
90675
Core
Vermeer
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
89.82k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
840.11k points
330.62k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.34k
43.24k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
26.8k
23.76k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.12k
12.67k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.55k
13.88k (x0.52)
TOTAL
89.82k
93.54k (x1.04)
Multithread
5900X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
263.12k
150.28k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
353.9k
126.29k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159.07k
45.32k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.01k
8.73k (x0.14)
TOTAL
840.11k
330.62k (x0.39)
Performance/W
5900X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3371 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1515 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
610 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
8001 points/W
9446 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5071 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5584 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2526 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5530 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
18712 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4