Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.4 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.4 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
50657
Core
Cezanne
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
11264 kB
Date
December 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
16.86k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
12.08k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
3.37k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
6.29k (x0.26)
TOTAL
81.87k
38.61k (x0.47)
Multithread
5900HS
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
150.99k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
118.54k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
33.44k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
8.6k (x1.49)
TOTAL
434.96k
311.57k (x0.72)
Performance/W
5900HS
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4