Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i7-6500U
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-6500U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i7-6500U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.5 times faster than the i7-6500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i7-6500U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.5 times faster than the i7-6500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
406e3
Core
Cezanne
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
kB
Date
December 2021
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
46.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
97.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
19.47k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
17.58k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
4.05k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
5.15k (x0.21)
TOTAL
81.87k
46.25k (x0.56)
Multithread
5900HS
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
42.05k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
40.2k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
9.4k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
5.86k (x1.01)
TOTAL
434.96k
97.52k (x0.22)
Performance/W
5900HS
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
2803 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
2680 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
626 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
391 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
6501 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
6279 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5672 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
1305 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
1662 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
14918 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4