Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i7-4720HQ
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i7-4720HQ gets 132.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 3.3 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i7-4720HQ gets 132.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 3.3 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306c3
Core
Cezanne
Haswell
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2021
January 2015
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
40.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
132.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
20.68k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
10.28k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
4.87k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
4.29k (x0.18)
TOTAL
81.87k
40.12k (x0.49)
Multithread
5900HS
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
66.84k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
42.85k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
16.77k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
5.88k (x1.02)
TOTAL
434.96k
132.35k (x0.3)
Performance/W
5900HS
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
1422 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
357 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
2816 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
5745 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
1352 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
11143 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4