| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i7-10700


Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.2 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0655
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
December 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
537.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
30.66k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
25.64k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
5.98k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
12.25k (x0.51)
TOTAL
81.87k
74.53k (x0.91)

Multithread

5900HS

i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
240.28k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
234.3k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
56.12k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
7.02k (x1.21)
TOTAL
434.96k
537.73k (x1.24)

Performance/W
5900HS
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
8273 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900HS
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4