| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i5-9500


Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ea
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
December 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
352.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
29.17k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
25.49k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
5.84k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
13.15k (x0.54)
TOTAL
81.87k
73.65k (x0.9)

Multithread

5900HS

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
166.66k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
146.9k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
34.04k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
5.25k (x0.91)
TOTAL
434.96k
352.84k (x0.81)

Performance/W
5900HS
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900HS
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4