| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i5-10500T


Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0653
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
302.13k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
25.16k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
22.28k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
5.18k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
11.97k (x0.49)
TOTAL
81.87k
64.6k (x0.79)

Multithread

5900HS

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
144.86k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
120.98k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
32.55k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
3.73k (x0.64)
TOTAL
434.96k
302.13k (x0.69)

Performance/W
5900HS
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900HS
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4