Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i5-10400T
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0653
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
307.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
22k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
19.98k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
4.57k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
11.31k (x0.47)
TOTAL
81.87k
57.85k (x0.71)
Multithread
5900HS
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
136.69k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
135.25k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
32.76k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
2.48k (x0.43)
TOTAL
434.96k
307.18k (x0.71)
Performance/W
5900HS
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4