| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.5 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
706e5
Core
Cezanne
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2021
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
171.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
21.5k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
17.71k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
7.92k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
8.24k (x0.34)
TOTAL
81.87k
55.37k (x0.68)

Multithread

5900HS

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
73.03k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
68.19k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
24.89k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
5.54k (x0.96)
TOTAL
434.96k
171.65k (x0.39)

Performance/W
5900HS
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900HS
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4