Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i3-8130U
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.9 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.9 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806ea
Core
Cezanne
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2021
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
88.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
21.09k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
19.41k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
4.05k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
2.8k (x0.12)
TOTAL
81.87k
47.35k (x0.58)
Multithread
5900HS
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
38.23k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
38.89k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
8.75k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
2.47k (x0.43)
TOTAL
434.96k
88.35k (x0.2)
Performance/W
5900HS
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
5890 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4