Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
860f01
Core
Cezanne
Renoir
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
December 2021
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
436.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
16.59k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
23.51k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
9.38k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
7.98k (x0.33)
TOTAL
81.87k
57.47k (x0.7)
Multithread
5900HS
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
152.43k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
195.79k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
83.2k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
5.38k (x0.93)
TOTAL
434.96k
436.8k (x1)
Performance/W
5900HS
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
9707 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4