Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.2 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.2 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
800f11
Core
Cezanne
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
December 2021
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
372.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
13.72k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
22.48k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
5.12k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
15.44k (x0.64)
TOTAL
81.87k
56.76k (x0.69)
Multithread
5900HS
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
110.92k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
200.56k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
54.24k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
7.01k (x1.21)
TOTAL
434.96k
372.73k (x0.86)
Performance/W
5900HS
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4