| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Ryzen 5 5600


Description
Both models 5900HS and 5600 are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a20f12
Core
Cezanne
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
December 2021
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
429.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
22.73k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
24.59k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
11.44k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
25.03k (x1.03)
TOTAL
81.87k
83.79k (x1.02)

Multithread

5900HS

5600
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
134.28k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
178.56k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
78.16k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
38.26k (x6.6)
TOTAL
434.96k
429.25k (x0.99)

Performance/W
5900HS
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900HS
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4