Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Athlon 3000G
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.5 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.5 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
810f81
Core
Cezanne
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
13.02k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
20.56k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
4.81k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
5.43k (x0.22)
TOTAL
81.87k
43.82k (x0.54)
Multithread
5900HS
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
27.29k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
49.37k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
13.57k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
5.61k (x0.97)
TOTAL
434.96k
95.84k (x0.22)
Performance/W
5900HS
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4