Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i5-11400
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0671
Core
Cezanne
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
489.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
31.23k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
25.88k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
10.83k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
18.17k (x0.75)
TOTAL
81.87k
86.11k (x1.05)
Multithread
5900HS
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
213.85k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
195.51k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
72.06k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
7.89k (x1.36)
TOTAL
434.96k
489.31k (x1.12)
Performance/W
5900HS
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
7528 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4