Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 3.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 3.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806c1
Core
Cezanne
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
24.25k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
21.63k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
9.09k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
7.23k (x0.3)
TOTAL
81.87k
62.19k (x0.76)
Multithread
5900HS
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
56.9k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
55.68k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
19.29k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
6.09k (x1.05)
TOTAL
434.96k
137.96k (x0.32)
Performance/W
5900HS
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4