| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.6 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
306c3
Core
Renoir
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
4 /4
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2020
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
140.76k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
19.17k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
10.55k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
4.79k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
4.65k (x0.57)
TOTAL
53k
39.16k (x0.74)

Multithread

4900HS

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
73.13k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
42.06k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
18.03k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
7.54k (x1)
TOTAL
360.57k
140.76k (x0.39)

Performance/W
4900HS
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
1759 points/W

Performance/GHz
4900HS
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4