Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i9-10900X
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.8 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.8 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
50657
Core
Renoir
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
35 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
19712 kB
Date
March 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
25.97k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
22.37k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
5.3k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.63k (x1.05)
TOTAL
53k
62.28k (x1.17)
Multithread
4900HS
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
281.98k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
259.01k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
64.87k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
26.5k (x3.52)
TOTAL
360.57k
632.35k (x1.75)
Performance/W
4900HS
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4