| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i7-1065G7


Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.7 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
706e5
Core
Renoir
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
214.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
28.19k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
22.13k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
10.32k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
14.17k (x1.73)
TOTAL
53k
74.82k (x1.41)

Multithread

4900HS

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
86.39k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
86.22k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
32.99k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
8.75k (x1.16)
TOTAL
360.57k
214.34k (x0.59)

Performance/W
4900HS
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
4900HS
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4