Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i7-10610U
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
806ec
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
162k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
23.1k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
20k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
4.61k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.94k (x1.09)
TOTAL
53k
56.65k (x1.07)
Multithread
4900HS
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
73.36k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
68.28k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
13.73k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
6.62k (x0.88)
TOTAL
360.57k
162k (x0.45)
Performance/W
4900HS
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
6480 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4