| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i7-10510U


Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.9 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
806ec
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
190.82k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
22.85k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
21.15k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
4.78k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
10.24k (x1.25)
TOTAL
53k
59.01k (x1.11)

Multithread

4900HS

i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
86.08k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
79.78k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
18.26k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
6.69k (x0.89)
TOTAL
360.57k
190.82k (x0.53)

Performance/W
4900HS
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
5739 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
5319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
12721 points/W

Performance/GHz
4900HS
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
4664 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
2089 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
12044 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4